EBI: You need a more developed essay overall (of at least one side long) to include more of the mark scheme media, gatekeeping (and, possibly, news on the tweet)
Add at least one to each paragraph.
2.)
Level 3 - A good essay, showing good critical autonomy.
I think I have a clear and concise understanding, as well as good use of critical autonomy at appropriate times
Level 3 - Proficient understanding of new and digital media.
I think I have explored the causes of fake news and their effects, however I should include more examples and expand more to reach a top level
Level 2 - Focuses mainly on question.
I think that while I did explore the question, I didn't at some times directly address it and mention how it answers the question
Level 2 - Adequate application of media debates, issues and theories and/or wider contexts.
I think I introduced a fair amount of debates, issues and theories, however I need to expand and elaborate on them further, discussing the effects etc
Level 3 - A clear individual case study, with a range of examples.
I think I've introduced a fair number of case studies
Level 3 - Well structured and clearly concised
I think that I've expressed and introduced ideas that were very easy and comprehensible to digest in baby-sized chunks.
3.)
What I need to improve:
- Good answers used concepts of active and passive audiences to support their answers.
According to the examiner's report, I think I have:
- Good answers discussed the role of audiences in influencing and producing media content and the advantages and disadvantages of this for audiences and producers.
- Good answers discussed the different ‘value’ audiences placed on these sources.
4.)
- A* essays tend to elaborate a lot on even little points and their effects
- A* essays tend to introduce a lot of media theories and statistics
- A* essays tend to write longer essays
5.)
... In extension, fake news isn't always demonstrating a hypodermic effect using the audience, in fact, audiences are less passive and are allowed to interpret messages in their own way. This is as we call the "Internet revolution" where a wider range of opinions can be gathered and put forward their opinion for the rest of the other consumers to base their opinions on what they hear. As a result the Internet is consuming and altering the way in how dominant opinions are being formed about certain information on the Internet, and as said by Briggs and Burke, the Internet can be considered to be "the most important medium of the 20th century" given that it empowers the audience to a very large extent and can give alternative and dominant ideologies to any given information.
Also, statistically speaking "66% of 9-19 year olds who went online regularly had not been given any guidance about how to judge the accuracy of online information", with this being said there is a merging of opinions based on false information and genuine claims based on genuine information. The end result is that there is a very hard distinction to make between a right and wrong answer. This sort of audience empowerment combined with false agenda makes up for a very "unhealthy" and mislead set of manipulated ideas on the Internet. This factors into the damaging of the "Internet revolution again".
... In extension, fake news isn't always demonstrating a hypodermic effect using the audience, in fact, audiences are less passive and are allowed to interpret messages in their own way. This is as we call the "Internet revolution" where a wider range of opinions can be gathered and put forward their opinion for the rest of the other consumers to base their opinions on what they hear. As a result the Internet is consuming and altering the way in how dominant opinions are being formed about certain information on the Internet, and as said by Briggs and Burke, the Internet can be considered to be "the most important medium of the 20th century" given that it empowers the audience to a very large extent and can give alternative and dominant ideologies to any given information.
Also, statistically speaking "66% of 9-19 year olds who went online regularly had not been given any guidance about how to judge the accuracy of online information", with this being said there is a merging of opinions based on false information and genuine claims based on genuine information. The end result is that there is a very hard distinction to make between a right and wrong answer. This sort of audience empowerment combined with false agenda makes up for a very "unhealthy" and mislead set of manipulated ideas on the Internet. This factors into the damaging of the "Internet revolution again".
No comments:
Post a Comment